← Dataset search
SRR6322633
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
insufficient data to scoreStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
Data type / assay
methylation
Organism
Solanum lycopersicum
Instrument
HiSeq X Ten
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
8.83
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
10846102800
reported
total reads
36153676
reported
n content pct
0.002
measured
pct q20 bases
94.6
measured
pct q30 bases
87.5
measured
pct reads q30
92.5
measured
sampled bases
93470700
measured
sampled reads
623138
measured
gc content pct
23.9
measured
polyg tail pct
0
measured
read length sd
0
measured
quality dropoff
-6.4
measured
read length max
150
measured
read length min
150
measured
read length n50
150
measured
max base quality
41
measured
mean read length
150
measured
max n pct per pos
0.308
measured
mean base quality
37
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
0
measured
read length median
150
measured
adapter content pct
10.68
measured
median read quality
38.5
measured
duplication rate pct
15.45
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.06
measured
How this grade was computed
The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published methylation thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
87.5
measured
×1
88%
QC cost
45 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0