SRR6957988

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

35/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Brucella melitensis

Instrument

NextSeq 500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 475127296 reported

total reads 789248 reported

n content pct 0.003 measured

pct q20 bases 80.9 measured

pct q30 bases 65.1 measured

gc content pct 57.1 measured

mean read length 301 measured

mean base quality 29.9 measured

adapter content pct 8.96 measured

duplication rate pct 1.58 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 35/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 65.1 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 1.58 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 8.96 measured ×0.4 43%

QC cost 42 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0