Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
89/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Deep bulk RNA-seq from Prunus mume (Japanese apricot / Chinese plum) using HiSeq 3000 with 58.5M reads and solid 95% Q20, 86.5% Q30 enabling comprehensive transcriptome profiling of a commercially important rosaceous fruit tree. The 17.6B bases and 46% GC support gene expression studies across tissues, fruit development stages, or stress conditions in stone fruits. Reusable for comparative Prunus genomics, fruit-quality trait characterization, and breeding-directed transcript discovery in cultivars.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0