← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
45/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Eucalyptus pauciflora
Instrument
MinION
Platform
OXFORD_NANOPORE
Read type
long-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
7756063617
reported
total reads
866244
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
5.7
measured
pct q30 bases
0.3
measured
gc content pct
40.3
measured
mean read length
3773.9
measured
mean base quality
9.4
measured
adapter content pct
0.01
measured
duplication rate pct
10.31
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 45/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
0.3
measured
×1
0%
duplication rate pct
10.31
measured
×0.5
93%
adapter content pct
0.01
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
25 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0