Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
95/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Drosophila grimshawi bulk RNA-Seq dataset from the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform contains 8.8 million short reads (668.5 million bases) with excellent quality (99% Q20, 95.7% Q30 bytes). The outstanding base quality enables sensitive expression profiling of this Hawaiian Drosophila species. Search terms: Drosophila transcriptomics, HiSeq 2000, endemic species, comparative Drosophila, evolutionary expression studies.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0