Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
94/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Aphis gossypii (cotton aphid) RNA-seq on BGISEQ-500 with 60.8 million reads (6.08 Gb) and good quality (96.7% Q20, 87.1% Q30). Cost-effective transcript profiling for an agricultural pest; enables aphid genetics and plant-pest interaction studies on an alternative platform.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0