← Dataset search
SRR8517953
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
91/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WES
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
HiSeq X Ten
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
12404211300
reported
total reads
41347371
reported
n content pct
0.002
measured
pct q20 bases
96.4
measured
pct q30 bases
91.5
measured
gc content pct
57.4
measured
mean read length
150
measured
mean base quality
38.6
measured
adapter content pct
11.29
measured
duplication rate pct
5.11
measured
mean target coverage
200.1
extrapolated
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 91/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean target coverage
200.1
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
91.5
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
5.11
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
11.29
measured
×0.4
27%
QC cost
39 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0