← Dataset search
SRR8517971
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
93/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WES
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
HiSeq X Ten
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
19833045600
reported
total reads
66110152
reported
n content pct
0.001
measured
pct q20 bases
98
measured
pct q30 bases
95.1
measured
gc content pct
53.2
measured
mean read length
150
measured
mean base quality
39.7
measured
adapter content pct
8.37
measured
duplication rate pct
10.65
measured
mean target coverage
319.9
extrapolated
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 93/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean target coverage
319.9
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
95.1
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
10.65
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
8.37
measured
×0.4
47%
QC cost
31 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0