SRR8570220

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

91/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

High-quality RNA-seq with low duplication (21.29%) and strong read quality (Q30 94.8%, mean 37.6), but modest adapter contamination (11.45%) is the primary limitation. Longer read length (151 bp) provides good isoform resolution; suitable for reuse after light trimming if needed.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Solenopsis invicta

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 3663893898 reported

total reads 12132099 reported

n content pct 0.002 measured

pct q20 bases 96.4 measured

pct q30 bases 94.8 measured

gc content pct 34 measured

mean read length 151 measured

mean base quality 37.6 measured

adapter content pct 11.45 measured

duplication rate pct 21.29 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 91/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 94.8 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 37.6 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 11.45 measured ×0.4 48%

duplication rate pct 21.29 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 43 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0