Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
98/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Chilo suppressalis bulk RNA-seq grading A (98/100) with exceptional base quality (Q30=96.2%, mean=39.5) and 141bp reads, marginally penalized by 35% duplication (88/100). Duplication at this level is typical for quality RNA-seq; high base quality and read length strongly support gene expression quantification.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0