SRR8587775

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

96/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Bulk RNA-seq (HiSeq 2500, Drosophila suzukii). Grade A, with excellent Q30 (96.6%) and longer reads (125 bp) offset slightly by moderate duplication (36%, scored 87/100) and minor adapter elevation (3.73%)—reliable for transcript quantification and splicing analysis.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Drosophila suzukii

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 9010128250 reported

total reads 36040513 reported

n content pct 0.004 measured

pct q20 bases 98.4 measured

pct q30 bases 96.6 measured

gc content pct 47.8 measured

mean read length 125 measured

mean base quality 36.1 measured

adapter content pct 3.73 measured

duplication rate pct 36.01 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 96/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 96.6 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 36.1 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 3.73 measured ×0.4 90%

duplication rate pct 36.01 measured ×0.4 87%

QC cost 55 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0