Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
3 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
87/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Human whole-genome sequencing via Illumina HiSeq 2000 with good depth (568M reads, 37x coverage) but moderate quality metrics (89.8% Q20, 81.8% Q30), suggesting sequencing chemistry issues or lower-than-ideal library complexity. Depth partially compensates for quality concerns in variant calling, though genotyping confidence may vary.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0