Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
72/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
454-platform amplicon (Procladius; 449bp reads) grading C (72/100) due to massive 78% duplication and borderline Q30 (81.7%, 58/100 score). The very small dataset (4,652 reads) and extreme duplication render sequence diversity inadequate for reliable OTU/ASV analysis; deep resequencing is recommended.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0