Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRR871528

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

RNA-Seq (cnidarian, HiSeq 2000), perfect score with superior metrics: Q30 peaks at 96.4%, mean quality 37.3, duplication 30.57%, negligible adapter (0.03%), and ample depth (36.5M reads). Exceptional library quality across all dimensions.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Physalia physalis
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 7296354600 reported
total reads 36481773 reported
n content pct 0.004 measured
pct q20 bases 98.6 measured
pct q30 bases 96.4 measured
gc content pct 39.7 measured
mean read length 100 measured
mean base quality 37.3 measured
adapter content pct 0.03 measured
duplication rate pct 30.57 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 96.4 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 37.3 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 0.03 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 30.57 measured ×0.4 99%
QC cost 30 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 flagged mean score 68