Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
87/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bactrocera oleae bulk RNA-seq grading B (87/100) with excellent base metrics (Q30=95.9%, mean=37) severely constrained by extreme 64% duplication (24/100 score), indicating substantial PCR bias. High redundancy inflates apparent variance and degrades effective sample complexity; reuse demands deduplication or prioritization of biological replicates.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0