Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq 2500 short-read RNA-seq of Bombyx mori (silkworm) with 8.5 million reads and exceptional Q30 95.5% quality enables sensitive gene expression profiling in this economically important lepidopteran for silk science and model-organism research. The 51.4% GC and zero N-content support high-resolution analysis of tissue-specific or stimulus-induced transcriptional responses in silkworm development and physiology.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0