Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
96/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Myzus persicae RNA-seq grading A (96/100), anchored by excellent base quality (Q30=95.1%, mean=35.7) but modestly penalized by 6% adapter content (77/100). Longer 125bp reads and manageable 30% duplication support transcript quantification well; minor adapter levels are routine and pose minimal mapping bias.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0