Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
98/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
NextSeq 550 short-read RNA-seq of Camponotus floridanus (carpenter ant) with 19 million reads and very high Q30 97.3% offers superior sequence quality for social-insect transcriptomics and caste-differentiation studies in this model formicid. The 37.2% GC and minimal N-content support robust isoform discovery and expression quantification across ant behavioral and physiological states.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0