SRR8895653

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

98/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Bulk RNA-seq from Camponotus floridanus with grade A (98/100). Low-to-moderate duplication (34.3%) and zero adapter contamination are primary strengths; N content is elevated (0.462%), suggesting partial quality masking or trimming occurred. Overall excellent for expression analysis; verify N-region handling in the original study.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Camponotus floridanus

Instrument

NextSeq 550

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1877935349 reported

total reads 22644923 reported

n content pct 0.462 measured

pct q20 bases 95.7 measured

pct q30 bases 93.8 measured

gc content pct 39.3 measured

mean read length 41.5 measured

mean base quality 34.1 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 34.33 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 98/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 93.8 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 34.1 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 34.33 measured ×0.4 90%

QC cost 35 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0