Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
96/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq (HiSeq 2000, Apis mellifera). Grade A, excellent reusability. Q30 bases at 88.1% is the limiting metric (scored 90/100 with heaviest weight), while adapter content and duplication are negligible—suitable for transcript quantification, though Q30 warrants confirmation if downstream variant calling is planned.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0