Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
91/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk-RNA-seq from Bombyx mori (HiSeq 4000), grade A. Slightly elevated adapter content (4.85%) and moderate duplication (46.35%) are offset by excellent Q30 (94.5%), base quality (39.0), and longer reads (150 bp); the longer reads are a key advantage for mapping specificity. Suitable for publication after standard preprocessing.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0