Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
85/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Butterfly bulk RNA-seq with moderate quality but severe complexity issues. Grade B (85/100) masks a critical problem: 71.15% duplication rate (scored only 9/100) indicates technical replicates or low-complexity library, which will bias transcript counts and inflate false positives in differential expression. Duplication this high matters for quantitative accuracy—proceed with duplicate-aware tools or deep sequencing pooling.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0