SRR900629

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

83/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Butterfly bulk RNA-seq with dual quality compromise. Grade B (83/100) reflects both elevated duplication at 64.7% (scored 23/100) AND below-standard Q30 (87.9%, scored 90/100), with mean quality only 34.8. The combination of lower per-base quality and duplication limits this to abundance-focused studies; avoid for splice variant or low-count detection.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Melitaea cinxia

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 741869038 reported

total reads 3672619 reported

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 95.5 measured

pct q30 bases 87.9 measured

gc content pct 34.7 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 34.8 measured

adapter content pct 0.09 measured

duplication rate pct 64.7 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 83/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 87.9 measured ×1 90%

mean base quality 34.8 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0.09 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 64.7 measured ×0.4 23%

QC cost 41 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0