Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
86/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk-RNA-seq from Melitaea cinxia (HiSeq 2000), grade B. The 66.66% duplication rate is the primary drag on utility; despite excellent Q30 (90.2%) and base quality (35.2), this high duplication signals substantial PCR bias that will inflate transcript abundance estimates and confound differential expression calls. Reusable with aggressive deduplication and bias-aware modeling of expression changes.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0