SRR9006453

ENA first seen 2019

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

75/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Anindobothrium anacolum

Instrument

NextSeq 550

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 96189 reported

total reads 863 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 86.9 measured

pct q30 bases 80.9 measured

gc content pct 29.6 measured

mean read length 111.5 measured

mean base quality 31.7 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 9.27 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 75/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 80.9 measured ×1 55%

duplication rate pct 9.27 measured ×0.5 96%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 9 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0