Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
41/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina MiSeq whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of Paratrichobius longicrus with only 6,762 reads and 1.99 Mb total bases represents ultra-low-coverage data (likely a rare or poorly-sampled organism), offering draft-level genomic information unsuitable for complete assembly. The 23% GC is substantially lower than typical bacteria, suggesting either compositional bias or possible contamination; this dataset is primarily useful for presence-detection or phylogenetic placement rather than detailed genomic analysis.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0