Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
94/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Honey bee bulk RNA-seq with near-perfect chemistry and quality metrics. Grade A (94/100) driven by zero adapter content and Q30 of 95.4% (mean 39.1), making this ideal for low-abundance transcript detection; duplication at 46.92% (scored 62/100) is elevated but not prohibitive. Suitable for comprehensive transcriptome studies.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0