SRR9007900

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

97/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Bulk RNA-seq (HiSeq 4000, Apis mellifera). Grade A, high-quality reuse. Duplication at 38.1% is the primary limiter (scored 82/100), while Q30 (95.2%) and base quality (39) are excellent—reliable for RNA-seq quantification but elevated duplication suggests some PCR bias worth noting.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Apis mellifera

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 4000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 3086072505 reported

total reads 31121509 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 98.3 measured

pct q30 bases 95.2 measured

gc content pct 37.2 measured

mean read length 99.2 measured

mean base quality 39 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 38.13 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 97/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 95.2 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 39 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 38.13 measured ×0.4 82%

QC cost 41 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0