SRR9007910

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

88/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Honey bee bulk RNA-seq with unusually high duplication for the species. Grade B (88/100) shows excellent chemistry (zero adapter, mean quality 38.9, Q30 94.9%) but 62.08% duplication (scored 29/100) is anomalously high relative to companion A. mellifera samples, suggesting a library-specific bottleneck. Duplication this high will suppress detection of moderate-abundance transcripts.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Apis mellifera

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 4000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 2946551523 reported

total reads 29702754 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 98.3 measured

pct q30 bases 94.9 measured

gc content pct 38.8 measured

mean read length 99.2 measured

mean base quality 38.9 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 62.08 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 88/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 94.9 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 38.9 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 62.08 measured ×0.4 29%

QC cost 29 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0