Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
99/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Honey bee bulk RNA-seq with exceptional quality and controlled duplication. Grade A (99/100) reflects outstanding base quality (Q30 92.1%, mean 35.7) and low duplication (25.82%, scored 100/100), with only minor adapter content (3.02%) preventing a perfect score. This is among the highest-quality datasets and suitable for all RNA-seq applications including low-abundance isoform detection.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0