Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
88/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Butterfly bulk RNA-seq with moderate-high duplication and good base quality. Grade B (88/100) benefits from solid Q30 (93.5%) and quality metrics (36.8 mean), but 63.34% duplication (scored 26/100) remains concerning for expression quantification. The duplication is high enough that variant and expression calls risk false enrichment from PCR-amplified molecules.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0