SRR902127

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

69/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Bulk-RNA-seq from Melitaea cinxia (HiScanSQ), grade D—use with significant caution. Low Q30 (81.9%) and lowest base quality (32.8%) are the primary concerns; combined with moderate duplication (53.92%), the data is suitable only for high-confidence calls in well-expressed regions. HiScanSQ platform age compounds accuracy issues; key findings should be validated.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Melitaea cinxia

Instrument

Illumina HiScanSQ

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1037656300 reported

total reads 10376563 reported

n content pct 0.038 measured

pct q20 bases 88.8 measured

pct q30 bases 81.9 measured

gc content pct 29.5 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 32.8 measured

adapter content pct 0.6 measured

duplication rate pct 53.92 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 69/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 81.9 measured ×1 60%

mean base quality 32.8 measured ×0.6 80%

adapter content pct 0.6 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 53.92 measured ×0.4 47%

QC cost 38 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0