SRR902145

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

78/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Bulk RNA-seq from Melitaea cinxia with grade C (78/100). Moderate duplication (52.7%) and significantly below-target Q30 (84.1%) create substantial uncertainty in expression estimates; the combination of metrics limits biological signal recovery. Marginal for secondary discovery only; independent validation strongly recommended.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Melitaea cinxia

Instrument

Illumina HiScanSQ

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 372642700 reported

total reads 3726427 reported

n content pct 0.008 measured

pct q20 bases 92.8 measured

pct q30 bases 84.1 measured

gc content pct 30.9 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 33.6 measured

adapter content pct 0.19 measured

duplication rate pct 52.72 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 78/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 84.1 measured ×1 71%

mean base quality 33.6 measured ×0.6 93%

adapter content pct 0.19 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 52.72 measured ×0.4 50%

QC cost 58 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0