SRR902151

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

87/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Bulk RNA-seq from Melitaea cinxia with grade B (87/100). Very high duplication (66.3%) despite excellent base quality (Q30=93.4%, mean=36.3) indicates PCR over-amplification; will systematically distort transcript abundance estimates. Reusable but deduplication is essential, and cross-validation with independent data is strongly recommended.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Melitaea cinxia

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 523449064 reported

total reads 5182664 reported

n content pct 0.018 measured

pct q20 bases 97.3 measured

pct q30 bases 93.4 measured

gc content pct 30.6 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 36.3 measured

adapter content pct 1.15 measured

duplication rate pct 66.34 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 87/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 93.4 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 36.3 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 1.15 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 66.34 measured ×0.4 19%

QC cost 46 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0