SRR902217

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

82/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Butterfly bulk RNA-seq with moderate dual limitations. Grade B (82/100) reflects 59.39% duplication (scored 35/100) and Q30 of 86.4% (scored 82/100), with mean quality 34.2 at lower bounds. While duplication is the primary concern, the marginal per-base quality adds compound uncertainty—best suited for presence/absence calls rather than quantitative differential expression.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Melitaea cinxia

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 369229300 reported

total reads 3692293 reported

n content pct 0.006 measured

pct q20 bases 94.3 measured

pct q30 bases 86.4 measured

gc content pct 30.5 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 34.2 measured

adapter content pct 0.23 measured

duplication rate pct 59.39 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 82/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 86.4 measured ×1 82%

mean base quality 34.2 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0.23 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 59.39 measured ×0.4 35%

QC cost 1 min compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0