Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
86/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Butterfly bulk RNA-seq with persistent duplication signal. Grade B (86/100) shows 67.48% duplication (scored 17/100) consistent with this organism's library prep challenges, despite acceptable Q30 (93.2%) and quality (36.2 mean). The duplication will compress dynamic range in expression estimates—best suited for presence/absence or highly abundant targets.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0