SRR902436

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

87/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Butterfly bulk RNA-seq with good quality marred by duplication. Grade B (87/100) has high-quality bases (Q30 92.8%, mean 36.1) and minimal adapter (0.28%), but 64.41% duplication (scored 24/100) will compress the dynamic range of expression estimates. The quality supports sensitive detection, but duplication will mask fold-change differences at moderate abundance levels.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Melitaea cinxia

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 291369648 reported

total reads 2884848 reported

n content pct 0.002 measured

pct q20 bases 96.7 measured

pct q30 bases 92.8 measured

gc content pct 27.6 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 36.1 measured

adapter content pct 0.28 measured

duplication rate pct 64.41 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 87/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 92.8 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 36.1 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0.28 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 64.41 measured ×0.4 24%

QC cost 33 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0