SRR902445

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

90/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Bulk RNA-seq (HiScanSQ, Melitaea cinxia). Grade A despite duplication at 56.3% (scored 42/100), which substantially limits comparative utility. Base quality is acceptable (89.8% Q30), but high duplication may mask isoform structure—use for detection-level work only.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Melitaea cinxia

Instrument

Illumina HiScanSQ

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 137105700 reported

total reads 1371057 reported

n content pct 0.015 measured

pct q20 bases 95.5 measured

pct q30 bases 89.8 measured

gc content pct 29.6 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 35.2 measured

adapter content pct 0.17 measured

duplication rate pct 56.3 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 90/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 89.8 measured ×1 99%

mean base quality 35.2 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0.17 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 56.3 measured ×0.4 42%

QC cost 31 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0