SRR902452

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

79/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Butterfly bulk RNA-seq with compounded moderate deficits. Grade C (79/100) combines 60.63% duplication (scored 32/100) with Q30 of only 85.4% (scored 77/100) and lower mean quality (33.9). Two simultaneous quality dimensions (duplication and per-base quality) are below acceptable thresholds, limiting utility to high-abundance targets or qualitative assessments only.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Melitaea cinxia

Instrument

Illumina HiScanSQ

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 843111500 reported

total reads 8431115 reported

n content pct 0.005 measured

pct q20 bases 91.6 measured

pct q30 bases 85.4 measured

gc content pct 25.3 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 33.9 measured

adapter content pct 0.55 measured

duplication rate pct 60.63 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 79/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 85.4 measured ×1 77%

mean base quality 33.9 measured ×0.6 98%

adapter content pct 0.55 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 60.63 measured ×0.4 32%

QC cost 17 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0