SRR9025057

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

97/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Drosophila bulk RNA-seq with excellent quality metrics and long reads. Grade A (97/100) reflects outstanding base quality (Q30 94.8%, mean 36.5), longer insert size (126 bp), and low duplication (28.95%), supporting high-resolution transcript isoform analysis; adapter content at 5.31% (scored 82/100) is the minor detractor. Well-suited for splicing and rare isoform studies.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Drosophila simulans

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 6724045440 reported

total reads 26682720 reported

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 97.7 measured

pct q30 bases 94.8 measured

gc content pct 50.9 measured

mean read length 126 measured

mean base quality 36.5 measured

adapter content pct 5.31 measured

duplication rate pct 28.95 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 97/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 94.8 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 36.5 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 5.31 measured ×0.4 82%

duplication rate pct 28.95 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 1 min compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0