SRR9041548

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

29/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Bulk RNA-seq from Apis mellifera with grade F (29/100). Severely compromised by catastrophically low Q30 (66.6%, scored 0/100) and poor mean base quality (28.9); these failures render the dataset unsuitable for primary analysis. Not recommended for reuse without extensive independent validation and transparent limitation reporting.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Apis mellifera

Instrument

NextSeq 500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 11769505248 reported

total reads 48620338 reported

n content pct 0.154 measured

pct q20 bases 76.3 measured

pct q30 bases 66.6 measured

gc content pct 47.9 measured

mean read length 118.9 measured

mean base quality 28.9 measured

adapter content pct 0.72 measured

duplication rate pct 53.05 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 29/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 66.6 measured ×1 0%

mean base quality 28.9 measured ×0.6 15%

adapter content pct 0.72 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 53.05 measured ×0.4 49%

QC cost 44 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0