Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
99/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Citrus maxima (pomelo) bulk RNA-Seq on HiSeq 4000 spans 10.5 Gb with 35 million reads and excellent quality (98.8% Q20, 96.5% Q30), providing clean transcriptome data for this large-fruited Citrus species. The dataset suits studies of citrus fruit development, disease resistance, and flavor-compound biosynthesis. Citrus genomics and breeding can use this high-quality pomelo RNA-seq.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0