Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
97/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Plant whole-genome sequencing with excellent long-read performance. Grade A (97/100) driven by very low duplication (10.64%, scored 92/100) and longer reads (150 bp mean), enabling robust unique mapping and structural accuracy; Q30 at 89.8% and minimal adapter (0.83%) support high-confidence variant calls. Excellent for assembly and structural variant studies.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0