Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome short-read sequencing (Citrus aurantium); high-quality WGS with grade A (100/100). Duplication rate of 8.18% was the sole limiting factor (scored 99/100), indicating minimal PCR bias and excellent fidelity for reference-quality assembly. All other measured metrics—Q30 of 98.4% and base quality of 38.9—are outstanding, making this dataset fully suitable for reuse.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0