Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
97/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This second Citrus x aurantium WGS on NovaSeq 6000 covers 8.3 Gb with 32.7 million reads and exceptional quality (99.2% Q20, 98.4% Q30, 0% N-content), providing replicate high-quality sequencing for this citrus species. Both C. x aurantium samples deliver NovaSeq-grade accuracy. Citrus comparative genomics can leverage both bitter-orange genomes.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0