Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
94/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This second Ceratitis capitata RNA-Seq on HiSeq 2000 covers 1.4 Gb with 9.2 million reads and good quality (95.6% Q20, 89.8% Q30), providing replicate or developmental-condition-specific data for this fruit-fly pest. Both C. capitata samples enable comparative expression analysis. Insect pest biology can integrate both Mediterranean fruit-fly datasets.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0