Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
95/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Ceratitis capitata (Mediterranean fruit fly) bulk RNA-Seq on HiSeq 2000 spans 2.1 Gb with 13.6 million reads and good quality (95.4% Q20, 89.5% Q30), providing transcriptome data for this economically important insect pest. The dataset enables expression profiling related to development, reproduction, and pest-control strategies. Insect molecular biology and pest-management studies can use this fruit-fly RNA-seq.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0