Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
75/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Acyrthosiphon pisum (pea aphid) bulk RNA-Seq on HiSeq 2500 spans 5.6 Gb with 22 million reads and excellent quality (97.6% Q20, 94.7% Q30), providing clean transcriptome data for this widely-studied insect-host model. The dataset suits studying symbiosis, plant-insect interactions, and aphid development. Insect molecular biology and plant-pest studies can use this aphid RNA-seq.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0