Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
79/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This second Acyrthosiphon pisum RNA-Seq on HiSeq 2500 covers 5.3 Gb with 20.8 million reads and good quality (97.1% Q20, 93.9% Q30), providing replication for aphid-transcriptome studies. Both A. pisum samples enable robust differential-expression comparisons. Aphid molecular biology can combine both pea-aphid RNA-seq datasets.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0