Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Aedes aegypti (mosquito) RNA-Seq on AB SOLiD System 3.0 covers 981 Mb with 28 million reads but shows the platform's problematic Q30 (0%), indicating base-quality reporting limitations specific to SOLID color-space chemistry. The platform's older sequencing chemistry restricts utility despite the large read count. Contemporary mosquito studies should use updated platforms.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0